Despite receiving media attention in and , UBC policy concerning faculty-student relationships remains unchanged and, for the most part, unspoken of. If a student and professor had a relationship for outside gain, it would be mediated using the Conflict of Interest policy. Mac Lean says student-teacher relations should be given more attention by UBC — not necessarily because he believes that a complete ban should be introduced, but because it deserves a conversation. Margot Young, who sat on the Policy steering committee. The lack of any cohesive policy on faculty-student relationships has posed serious problems for the school and its community in the past. In June , UBC fired creative writing Chair Steven Galloway amidst allegations of sexual misconduct and reports that he had an affair with a student. It later came to light that the student accused Galloway of sexual assault.
Stay plugged into Penn with this daily newsletter rounding up all of the top headlines from top headlines from the DP, 34th Street, and Under the Button. The week’s top stories from the DP and beyond, meticulously curated for parents and alumni, and delivered into your inbox every Sunday morning. Subscribe to get the week’s top stories from The DP and beyond, meticulously curated for parents and alumni, delivered directly to your inbox.
The former Undergraduate Chair of the Psychology Department Robert Kurzban had a sexual relationship with an undergraduate female student while he was her instructor, according to three sources close to the student. This policy was recently updated to ban all sexual relations between faculty and undergraduate students regardless of time or context.
This policy applies to all University employees (including faculty), student prior to the effective date of this policy to the University offices specified above as.
This policy also applies to any individual under contract or on assignment at the university. This policy does not apply to student employees. Nothing in this policy replaces university policies on prohibited discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. Nor does it replace other university policies that may be related to conduct or relationships covered by this policy. The provisions of this policy apply regardless of the gender or the sexual orientation of the parties involved.
The university is committed to creating learning environments and working relationships in which students, faculty, and staff trust and respect one another. RIT recognizes that consensual romantic or sexual relationships between certain individuals in an educational environment may compromise the fairness and objectivity of educational decisions and the discharge of professional duties.
UPPS 04.04.39 – Consensual Relationships
Professionalism is fostered by an atmosphere of mutual trust and respect. Trust and respect are diminished when those in positions of authority abuse or appear to abuse their power. Those who abuse their power in such a context violate their duty to the University community.
Any romantic and/or sexual relationship(s) between a faculty member/instructor and a student continues to be prohibited even after a student has completed the.
R omantic relationships between university professors and their students are becoming less and less acceptable. Many of the new university policies that have emerged in the last few years have focused on undergraduates and how to better protect them, typically with a campus-wide ban on staff dating undergrads.
But a number of universities also demand that faculty members do not start relationships with graduate students they supervise. This month, Princeton University went further and declared that faculty members were no longer allowed to date any graduate student—even if the couple works in different departments. Pre-existing relationships are exempt from the new rule. The university is encouraging greater collaboration across departments, Burdine says, which extends the concerns about unequal power between a professor and a student beyond the immediate supervisory relationship.
Princeton is the first university to take the campus-wide step but others will follow, says Jamelle Sharpe , who works at the University of Illinois College of Law in Urbana-Champaign and has surveyed academic policies in this area. Sharpe is leading a cross-campus review of the University of Illinois regulations, and his team will make recommendations later this year. He says universities have traditionally distinguished between undergraduates and graduate students when they set consensual relationships policy, and assumed that undergrads need more protection.
But he says that may no longer be appropriate. And, he adds, it could be misleading to assume that graduate students are more resilient because they are usually older and so more mature. Those steps are not popular with everyone.
Faculty / Staff and Student Consensual Relationships Policy (Policy 7015)
To address situations in which two persons have an apparently voluntary romantic or sexual relationship, but where a power differential exists because of their roles within the university, e. The University of Kansas has a tradition of commitment to providing an academic community environment that, without discrimination, fosters intellectual, professional and personal growth.
Central to the preservation of this environment is the trust that should characterize all interactions among those working toward the common goal of the institution, namely, our students, faculty, unclassified staff, and university support staff. This trust is put at risk when members of the University community engage in consenting romantic or sexual relationships that involve persons of unequal power, for example, administrator and faculty, faculty and student, supervisor and employee.
Because the University of Kansas strongly disapproves of consenting relationships where a professional power differential exists, this policy statement is being promulgated.
This Policy applies to faculty, academic staff, and graduate teaching dating, and/or sexual nature entered into with consent of both parties.
Exceptions to any of these prohibitions will be considered by the Office of the Provost or the Office of Human Resources on a limited, case-by-base basis. In keeping with this University policy, if charges of sexual harassment are made, the existence of a consensual relationship in any of the contexts stated above shall not be a defense in any proceeding brought by the Office of Residence Life and Housing, Office of the Provost, or Office of Human Resources.
This policy is intended to be an addition to existing University rules and regulations and does not alter or modify any existing University rule or regulation. How do I change my HSA contribution? How do I contact Sedgwick? How do I change my b voluntary election? Announcements Continued flexibility in schedules More Information.
This policy was approved by the Board of Trustees on June 21, The University has a duty to provide for the student those privileges, opportunities, and protections which best promote the learning process in all its aspects. The relationship between an instructor  and a student plays an important role in accomplishing this mission.
Certain responsibilities bestowed upon instructors have long been codified in the Faculty Rights and Responsibilities policy:. The teacher has the responsibility to encourage the pursuit of learning by students by manifesting the best academic standards of the discipline or profession. To accord students respect as individuals, the teacher shall seek to establish a relationship of mutual trust and to establish an appropriate role as an intellectual guide, counselor and mentor, both in and out of the classroom.
As one graduate.
This policy covers all UW System employees, students, and affiliated individuals. The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the employment and academic environment is free from real or perceived conflicts of interest when UW employees, students, and affiliated individuals, in positions of unequal power, are involved in consensual romantic or sexual relationships. Even where negative consequences to the participants do not result, such relationships create an environment charged with potential or perceived conflicts of interest and possible use of academic or supervisory leverage to maintain or promote the relationship.
Romantic or sexual relationships that the parties may view as consensual may still raise questions of favoritism, as well as of an exploitative abuse of trust and power. The following two types of consensual relationships are addressed in this policy: 1 employee with a student; and 2 employee with another employee. It is a violation of this policy for an instructor to commence a consensual relationship with a student currently under their instruction, and may result in disciplinary action against that employee.
If an instructor or other employee fails to meet the requirements for disclosing the relationship with a student or another employee, or fails to cooperate in the actions described above, such a failure constitutes a violation of this policy and may result in disciplinary action taken against that employee. To report potential violations of this policy, individuals should contact either the Director of Human Resources or the Title IX Coordinator.
Retaliation against persons who report concerns about potential violations of this policy is prohibited. Each UW institution shall publish this policy in a location accessible to faculty, staff, students, and the public. Each chancellor or his or her designee shall be responsible for implementing institutional procedures consistent with this policy.
Former Student, Fair Game?
Consensual romantic relationships between undergraduate students and faculty are not necessarily common, but they are potentially high-risk because they can generate costly sexual harassment claims by students against colleges and universities. In addition, they may damage participants professionally and personally. These faculty members often claimed consensual relationships with the complaining students.
In the past few years, national media attention has focused on multiple high-profile sexual harassment allegations against professors, including several who had consensual relationships with students. In their efforts to prevent sexual harassment, institutions should review and, if appropriate, consider updating their written consensual relationship policies.
A personal relationship of a sexual or other intimate nature between a member of staff and a student, with whom that member of staff also has a professional.
The University of North Carolina Board of Governors adopted a system-wide Policy that prohibits amorous or sexual relationships between faculty or staff employees and 1 students they evaluate or supervise by virtue of their teaching, research, administrative, or other employment responsibility and 2 students who are minors below the age of eighteen. The Policy also states that faculty or staff employees may not supervise or evaluate students to whom they are related by blood, law, or marriage.
Because of the sensitive nature of such relationships, every reasonable effort should be made to resolve alleged Policy violations on an informal basis if possible. Concerns about problems related to this Policy may be taken to the administrative official most directly involved, excluding the person alleged to have violated this Policy, or to one of the individuals listed below in Section VI.
Any remedial actions taken by the administrative official most directly concerned, excluding the person alleged to have violated this Policy, will depend on the totality of the circumstances. Efforts should be made to be constructively educational for concerned parties and to be corrective rather than punitive if a Policy violation is found: an acknowledgment of the violation and a commitment not to violate the Policy in the future, along with a warning or other appropriate action directed toward the faculty or staff member, may be sufficient resolution.
This relationship vests considerable trust in the teacher, who, in turn, bears authority and accountability as a mentor, educator, and evaluator. The unequal institutional power inherent in this relationship heightens the vulnerability of the student and the potential for coercion. The pedagogical relationship between teacher and student must be protected from influences or activities that can interfere with learning and personal development. Whenever a teacher is or in the future might reasonably become responsible for teaching, advising, or directly supervising a student, a sexual relationship between them is inappropriate and must be avoided.
In addition to creating the potential for coercion, any such relationship jeopardizes the integrity of the educational process by creating a conflict of interest and may impair the learning environment for other students. Finally, such situations may expose the University and the teacher to liability for violation of laws against sexual harassment and sex discrimination.
Establishes policy governing the supervision or evaluation of students by faculty/staff members, where a consensual relationship exists. Effective Date. July
A number of colleges and universities banned faculty-undergraduate dating or otherwise shored up their consensual relationship policies after the Education Department published a reminder letter about sexual harassment liability, in Other institutions had adopted such policies earlier. And while many involved in or affected by these decisions support them as preventing potential abuse, others remain critical of policing connections between consenting adults.
Fear of legal liability and increasing acknowledgement of academic power structures changed that, leading institutions to adopt a mix of policies regarding these relationships. Its rationale for doing so, stated in the policy itself, sums up much of the thinking behind blanket bans on undergraduate-faculty dating. Northwestern previously banned relationships between graduate students and faculty supervisors.
There is no hardfast rule about these policies. Somewhere in the middle of the policy mix, the University of Wisconsin System in banned faculty-student dating graduate or undergraduate where an advisory or supervisory relationship, or the potential for one, exists. Pre-existing relationships must be reported. Syracuse University is considering something similar.
The latter policy was a compromise, following debate over an ealier version that would have banned dating between graduate students and professors in the same program. Such a strict policy remains rare, since even other relatively restrictive codes allow for graduate students to date professors where no evaluative authority exits. Apart from blanket bans on dating undergraduates, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst for the first time this spring banned student-faculty dating where an advisory relationship exists.
ARE THERE ANY PROHIBITED AMOROUS RELATIONSHIPS AMONG UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY MEMBERS?
Rutgers University professors are prohibited from having romantic relationships with graduate students in their departments — and all undergraduates — under a sweeping new policy created in response to concerns about sexual harassment on campus, school officials said. Under the new policy :. Couples who are currently in a relationship in violation of the new policy must apply to a university chancellor for an exemption within 30 days, campus officials said.
Married couples — such as a professor in one department and a spouse taking undergraduate classes in another department — will also have to apply for exemptions.
A consensual relationship is defined as any consensual dating, romantic, This policy will be distributed to all faculty, staff, students, administrators, and will be.
While relationships between students and professors aren’t unheard of, they can be a source for all kinds of problems. A professor is in a position of authority over a student, whether or not he or she is that student’s teacher or supervisor, which makes any dating arrangement tricky at best. Ultimately, if the two are consenting adults there’s no scenario where it’s OK for a high school teacher to date a current student , there’s not much anyone can do to prevent them from pursuing a romantic relationship.
But expect there to be consequences. First things first: A student must be 18 years old to legally be able to consent to a relationship with an adult. Beyond that, some schools have specific rules about what to do if a student and a professor want to pursue a romantic relationship. Breaking those rules could jeopardize the professor’s job and the student’s status.